skip to content

NASA Logo

Langley Research Center

Turbulence Modeling Resource


 

 

Jump to: SA ResultsSSTm ResultsWilcox2006-klim-m ResultsK-kL-MEAH2015m ResultsEASMko2003-S ResultsK-e-Rt Results

Return to: Backward Facing Step Validation Intro Page

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 

2D Backward Facing Step Validation Case

SST-Vm Model Results
 

Link to SST-Vm equations

SST-Vm - backstep pressure coefficient SST-Vm - backstep skin friction

SST-Vm - backstep u-velocity profile upstream at x/H=-4 SST-Vm - backstep u'v' profile upstream at x/H=-4

SST-Vm - backstep u-velocity profiles SST-Vm - backstep u'v' profiles

Previously on this page the results were reported as SST-V solutions, but more properly they should be referred to as SST-Vm. Essentially no difference is expected.

Note that thorough grid studies were not performed for validation cases such as this one. Some effort was made to ensure reasonable grid resolutions, but there may still be small noticeable discretization errors. Therefore, these validation results shown should be considered representative, but not "truth."

The plots shown compare the SST-Vm results from three independent CFD codes: CFL3D, FUN3D, and WIND, with the experimental data for ReH=36,000. (Note that Cp values have been shifted so that Cp is close to zero near x/H=40.) Both CFL3D and FUN3D used freestream turbulence intensity=0.061% and freestream turbulent viscosity (relative to laminar)=0.009 (additional details can be found in the CFL3D User's Manual, Appendix H). WIND used freestream turbulence intensity=0.043% and freestream turbulent viscosity (relative to laminar)=0.001. Please read note 5 on Notes on running CFD page. These results are from the second-finest grid (257x257, 97x257, 385x449, 129x449). Note that for this particular case the SST-Vm model does not converge readily to a steady-state result when using any of these codes on this refined grid. However, when run time-accurately, the solution settles down and becomes reasonably steady (quasi-steady). Reattachment is predicted by the SST-Vm model near x/H = 6.35. Note that these are compressible code results at "essentially incompressible" conditions of M=0.128. There may be a very small influence of compressibility. Cp experimental data and CFD results have been shifted so that Cp is approximately 0 near x/H=40 (see brief discussion on Backward Facing Step Validation Intro Page). The data files from the quasi-steady CFL3D results are given here: backstep_cfl3d_cp_sstv.dat, backstep_cfl3d_cf_sstv.dat, backstep_cfl3d_vel_sstv.dat, backstep_cfl3d_uv_sstv.dat. (Note: the profiles have been interpolated using Tecplot software onto pre-set points, that may or may not correspond to the actual grid points or grid cells used in the computation.) A typical CFL3D input file is: backstep_cfl3d_typical_sstv.inp. A typical FUN3D input file is: fun3d.nml_typical_sstv_timeaccurate.


 
 

Jump to: SA ResultsSSTm ResultsWilcox2006-klim-m ResultsK-kL-MEAH2015m ResultsEASMko2003-S ResultsK-e-Rt Results

Return to: Backward Facing Step Validation Intro Page

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 
 


Recent significant updates:
08/28/2020 - changed SST-V naming to SST-Vm

Privacy Act Statement

Accessibility Statement

Responsible NASA Official: Ethan Vogel
Page Curator: Clark Pederson
Last Updated: 03/12/2025