skip to content

NASA Logo

Langley Research Center

Turbulence Modeling Resource


 

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 

AJM163H: Heated Mach 1.63 Axisymmetric Jet

See the related Temperature-Matched Mach 1.63 Axisymmetric Jet and Off-Design Mach 1.63 Axisymmetric Jet cases.

The purpose here is to provide a validation case for turbulence models. Unlike verification, which seeks to establish that a model has been implemented correctly, validation compares CFD results against data in an effort to establish a model's ability to reproduce physics. A small sequence of nested grids of the same family are provided here if desired. Data are also provided for comparison. For this particular supersonic jet case, the data are from experiment.

The experiment involved a supersonic jet issuing from an axisymmetric convergent-divergent nozzle with an exit diameter, Djet = 2 in. (50.8 mm). The jet exit Mach number for the particular case here is approximately Mjet=ujet/ajet=1.63. The divergent nozzle contour was designed with the Method of Characteristics to be yield a nearly shock-free flow in the divergent section of the nozzle and the jet plume. The nozzle pressure ratio was set to yield a nearly perfectly expanded Mach 1.63 flow at the nozzle exit. The nozzle's supply plenum was heated such that the jet exit static temperature was 233 K higher than the ambient static temperature.

In the experiment, the axisymmetric jet exits into quiescent (non-moving) air. However, because flow into quiescent air is difficult to achieve for some CFD codes, here the CFD is computed with a very low background ambient conditions (Mref=0.01, moving left-to-right, in the same direction as the jet). This boundary condition difference has some effect, but testing has indicated that the influence is relatively small and Mref=0.01 represents a reasonable compromise. The appropriate jet conditions are achieved by setting total pressure and temperature at the inflow plane to the nozzle, as shown in the figure.

It is important to note that this axisymmetric case is not a planar two-dimensional computation; it uses a periodic (rotated) grid system with appropriate boundary conditions on the periodic sides of the grid.

Heated Mach 1.63 round jet layout & BCs

GRIDS

The experimental operating conditions are summarized in the following table:

Case Number
Nozzle Geometry Mach No.
Nozzle Operating Mach No.
NPR
Nozzle Tt (K)
Jet delta T (K) = Ts-jet-Tamb
Ujet (m/s)
2
1.63
1.63
4.44
799.4
233
746.6

This case (referred to as "Case 2") was one of five examined in the 6th AIAA Propulsion Aerodynamics Workshop (PAW6). The related Temperature-Matched Mach 1.63 Axisymmetric Jet and Off-Design Mach 1.63 Axisymmetric Jet cases are two of the other cases considered in PAW6.

The experiment yielded measured velocities as well as turbulence quantities downstream of the jet exit using PIV. Velocity and turbulence profiles of interest are provided at the centerline (r/Djet = 0), along the nozzle lipline (r/Djet = 0.5), and at several x-locations in the jet. There is mean static temperature (T) and RMS of temperature (T') data, collected with rotationally resolved Raman scattering spectroscopy, along the nozzle centerline and lipline as well as at several x-locations.

Several RANS and scale resolving analyses were considered and are documented in:

A tar file of the data for all 5 PAW6 cases is in the link below. As mentioned above, this heated Mach 1.63 jet is listed as "Case 2."

The experimental data references are:

Heated Mach 1.63 round jet, u-velocity along y=0 Heated Mach 1.63 round jet, turbulent kinetic energy along y=0

Heated Mach 1.63 round jet, u-velocity at different x-stations Heated Mach 1.63 round jet, turbulent kinetic energy at different x-stations

Heated Mach 1.63 round jet, turbulent shear stress at different x-stations


 
 

What to Expect:
RESULTS
LINK TO EQUATIONS
MRR Level
SST-Vm
SST-Vm eqns
3

(Other turbulence model results may be added in the future.)
 
 

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 
 


Recent significant updates:
None

Privacy Act Statement

Accessibility Statement

Responsible NASA Official: Ethan Vogel
Page Curator: Clark Pederson
Last Updated: 09/06/2024