!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> 2D NASA Wall-Mounted Hump Separated Flow Validation Case (no plenum) - SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 Model Results

skip to content

NASA Logo

Langley Research Center

Turbulence Modeling Resource


 

 

Jump to: SA ResultsSA-RC ResultsSSTm ResultsBSLm ResultsK-kL-MEAH2015m Results

Return to: 2D NASA Wall-Mounted Hump Separated Flow Case Intro Page

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 

2D NASA Wall-Mounted Hump Separated Flow Validation Case (no plenum)

SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 Model Results
 

Link to SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 equations

Note this case can also be run on grids WITH a plenum; see: 2D NASA Wall-Mounted Hump Separated Flow Validation Case SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 page.

SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 - surface pressure coefficients SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 - surface skin friction coefficients

SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 - u-velocity upstream at x/c=-2.14 SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 - u-velocities at several locations

SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 - u'v' at x/c=0.65 SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 - u'v' at several locations SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 - u-velocities and streamlines (CFL3D)

Note that thorough grid studies were not performed for validation cases such as this one. Some effort was made to ensure reasonable grid resolutions, but there may still be small noticeable discretization errors. Therefore, these validation results shown should be considered representative, but not "truth."

The plots shown compare the SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 results from two independent CFD codes: CFL3D and FUN3D, along with experimental data, using grids with no plenum included (results with or without plenum are very similar for this case). The CFD codes predict the flow separation to occur near x/c = 0.653-0.654 and reattachment near x/c = 1.18 (in experiment these were 0.665 and 1.1, respectively). In the streamline plot, note that the bubble shows some evidence of "back-bending" (closing off at the wall upstream of the bubble's furthest extent) near reattachment. Both CFL3D and FUN3D used freestream turbulence intensity=0.077% and freestream turbulent viscosity (relative to laminar)=0.009 (additional details can be found in the CFL3D User's Manual, Appendix H). Please read note 5 on Notes on running CFD page. These results are from the second-finest grid (817 x 217). Both codes gave results that were reasonably close on this grid. Note that these are compressible code results at "essentially incompressible" conditions of M=0.1. There may be a very small influence of compressibility. Also note that the CFD's reference pressure is different from the experiment (to attain the same reference dynamic pressure); so a shift is necessary to align the Cp levels. The data files from CFL3D are given here: nasahump_cfl3d_cp_noplenum_ssglrrrsm.dat, nasahump_cfl3d_cf_noplenum_ssglrrrsm.dat, nasahump_cfl3d_vel_noplenum_ssglrrrsm.dat, nasahump_cfl3d_uv_noplenum_ssglrrrsm.dat, (Note: the profiles have been interpolated using Tecplot software onto pre-set points, that may or may not correspond to the actual grid points or grid cells used in the computation.) A typical CFL3D input file is: nasahump_cfl3d_typical_noplenum_ssglrrrsm.inp. A typical FUN3D input file is: fun3d.nml_typical_hump_ssglrr.


 
 

Jump to: SA ResultsSA-RC ResultsSSTm ResultsBSLm ResultsK-kL-MEAH2015m Results

Return to: 2D NASA Wall-Mounted Hump Separated Flow Case Intro Page

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 
 


Privacy Act Statement

Accessibility Statement

Responsible NASA Official: Ethan Vogel
Page Curator: Clark Pederson
Last Updated: 03/17/2025