skip to content

NASA Logo

Langley Research Center

Turbulence Modeling Resource


 

 

Jump to: SA ResultsSSTm ResultsSST-Vm ResultsSSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 ResultsWilcox2006-klim-m ResultsK-kL-MEAH2015m ResultsEASMko2003-S ResultsK-e-Rt Results

Return to: NACA 0012 Validation Intro Page

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 

2D NACA 0012 Airfoil Validation Case

SA-RC Results
 

Link to SA-RC equations

SA-RC - CL vs alpha SA-RC - CD vs CL

SA-RC - Cp vs x/c at alpha=0 SA-RC - Cf vs x/c at alpha=0

SA-RC - Cp vs x/c at alpha=10 SA-RC - Cf vs x/c at alpha=10

SA-RC - Cp vs x/c at alpha=15 SA-RC - Cf vs x/c at alpha=15

Note that thorough grid studies were not performed for validation cases such as this one. Some effort was made to ensure reasonable grid resolutions, but there may still be small noticeable discretization errors. Therefore, these validation results shown should be considered representative, but not "truth." (See the NACA 0012 Numerical Analysis Case for a representative verification exercise of this airfoil case.)

Above SA-RC results are from CFL3D, FUN3D, and NTS on the 897x257 grid. All three codes used used freestream value of the SA turbulence field variable (relative to laminar)=3. Please read note 5 on Notes on running CFD page. Results are overall very close between the three codes, with the largest difference seen in drag at alpha=15 deg (less than 3% difference). These discrepancies between codes are due to discretization errors, boundary condition differences, and/or possible code-to-code implementation-detail differences. See NACA 0012 Numerical Analysis Page for more discussion about numerical issues associated with the NACA 0012 airfoil case. Note that these are compressible code results at "essentially incompressible" conditions of M=0.15. There may be a very small influence of compressibility. Only the CFD data files from CFL3D's SA-RC results are given here for reference: n0012clcd_cfl3d_sarc.dat, n0012cp_cfl3d_sarc.dat, and n0012cf_cfl3d_sarc.dat. A typical CFL3D input file is: n0012_cfl3d_typical_sarc.inp. A typical FUN3D input file is: fun3d.nml_typical_sarc_2.

CODE
CL (alpha=0)
CL (alpha=10)
CL (alpha=15)
CD (alpha=0)
CD (alpha=10)
CD (alpha=15)
CFL3D
approx 0
1.0947
1.5560
0.00793
0.01179
0.02066
FUN3D
approx 0
1.1020
1.5651
0.00790
0.01191
0.02099
NTS
approx 0
1.0933
1.5562
0.00792
0.01193
0.02043

 

Behavior of model near CLmax:

The behavior of the SA-RC model near maximum lift for this 2-D case is shown in the following plots (CFL3D only). The cases were run every 1 deg (starting at 15 deg.), at least until CL,max was approximately attained. An approximate CL,max range from experiments (McCroskey, AGARD CP-429, July 1988; also NASA TM 100019, October 1987) is highlighted in the first plot by green dashed lines. Note, however, that experimental data near maximum lift no doubt contains a significant degree of three-dimensionality. Also, these CFD results are still on the 897x257 grid, and there is likely to be significantly more grid sensitivity for the higher angles of attack than for the lower angles of attack shown above. Therefore, the results below should only be viewed qualitatively.

SA-RC - CL vs alpha near CLmax SA-RC - CD vs CL near CLmax


 
 

Jump to: SA ResultsSSTm ResultsSST-Vm ResultsSSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 ResultsWilcox2006-klim-m ResultsK-kL-MEAH2015m ResultsEASMko2003-S ResultsK-e-Rt Results

Return to: NACA 0012 Validation Intro Page

Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page


 
 


Recent significant updates:
07/05/2016 - added NTS results

Privacy Act Statement

Accessibility Statement

Responsible NASA Official: Ethan Vogel
Page Curator: Clark Pederson
Last Updated: 03/04/2025