![]() |
Langley Research CenterTurbulence Modeling Resource |
Jump to: SA Results, SSTm Results, BSLm Results, SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 Results, Wilcox2006-klim-m Results, K-kL-MEAH2015m Results, EASMko2003-S Results, K-e-Rt Results, GLVY-RSM-2012 Results
Return to: Flat Plate Validation Intro Page
Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page
2D Zero Pressure Gradient Flat Plate Validation Case
SST-Vm Model Results
Link to SST-Vm equations
Previously on this page the results were reported as SST-V solutions, but more properly they should be referred
to as SST-Vm. Essentially no difference is expected.
Above SST-Vm results are from CFL3D on the 545x385 grid;
FUN3D results on same grid are almost identical.
Both CFL3D and FUN3D used freestream turbulence intensity=0.039% and freestream turbulent viscosity (relative to laminar)=0.009
(additional details can be found in the CFL3D User's Manual, Appendix H).
Please read note 5 on Notes on running CFD page.
See also the
Flat Plate Verification case.
The right-hand plot is extracted from the location where Retheta=10000.
Note that these are compressible code results
at "essentially incompressible" conditions of M=0.2.
There may be a very small influence of compressibility.
Note that use of SST, SSTm, SST-V, or SST-Vm
yield nearly identical results for this case.
The CFD postprocessed data files are given here for reference:
sstv-cf_cfl3d.dat and
sstv-upyp_cfl3d.dat.
A typical CFL3D input file is:
cfl3d_typical_sstv.inp.
A typical FUN3D input file is:
fun3d.nml_typical_sstv_2.
Jump to: SA Results,
SSTm Results,
BSLm Results,
SSG/LRR-RSM-w2012 Results,
Wilcox2006-klim-m Results,
K-kL-MEAH2015m Results,
EASMko2003-S Results,
K-e-Rt Results,
GLVY-RSM-2012 Results Return to: Flat Plate Validation Intro Page Return to: Turbulence Modeling Resource Home Page
Responsible NASA Official:
Ethan Vogel
Recent significant updates:
08/28/2020 - changed SST-V naming to SST-Vm
Page Curator:
Clark Pederson
Last Updated: 02/25/2025